no, even the smallest

Home › Forums › no, even the smallest

January 6, 2011 at 6:45 am #2931
Mike Garcen
Participant

    no, even the smallest blu-rays i’ve seen are still in the 20gb range, even if you remove any extras. Of course the size varies, but you have to remember that without any compression, a large portion of that video space is used for audio as well.

    If size is an issue, a lot of people have had success compressing their ripped blu-rays into a much more manageable MKV/H.264 file format. Of course understand ANY compression you do you reduce the original quality, so the question is…are you willing to sacrifice quality for storage? Especially given how inexpensive storage is?