Blu-ray Player Poll Results
Home › Forums › MissingRemote Playground › Blu-ray Player Poll Results
- This topic has 20 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by Andrew Van Til.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2010 at 8:38 pm #28396
[quote=”Mast3rL33″]
Funny. I run Win7 Home Premium x64 and have had no issues thus far.
[/quote]x86-64 support was only added build 2.1.6.131 but by that time they were a little behind PDVD and TMT3 was soon released.
October 12, 2010 at 11:26 pm #28397I currently use a component Blu-ray player after comparing pictures of the exact same movie. The video cards (ati 4850 HDMI) while getting better are still not quite there when comparing to a video chip in a console unit even after extensive calibration.. For HTPC I do prefer TMT3. I think the picture is best, still supports HD DVD and Blu-ray rip files. Another big factor into getting a console unit was the netflix streaming movie picture was superior by leaps and bounds.
October 13, 2010 at 10:53 am #28398HD-DVD support is a huge plus for TMT IMHO.
October 13, 2010 at 1:33 pm #28399[quote=”theblur20″]
The video cards (ati 4850 HDMI) while getting better are still not quite there when comparing to a video chip in a console unit even after extensive calibration..
[/quote]Really? I honestly have not been able to see much difference between the PC Graphics card and a dedicated unit. Though I dont have a unit to compare side by side.
October 13, 2010 at 5:03 pm #28400[quote=”Mast3rL33″]
[quote=”theblur20″]
The video cards (ati 4850 HDMI) while getting better are still not quite there when comparing to a video chip in a console unit even after extensive calibration..
[/quote]Really? I honestly have not been able to see much difference between the PC Graphics card and a dedicated unit. Though I dont have a unit to compare side by side.
[/quote]Ah now we can start this whole debate? 🙂 j/k
But seriously, there’s been threads and debates ever since the first HTPC came out debating the picture quality possibilities of it versus a separate dedicated device. There’s nothing definitive and usually just comes down to the individual’s opinion.
October 13, 2010 at 7:23 pm #28401[quote=”shadymg”]
[quote=”Mast3rL33″]
[quote=”theblur20″]
The video cards (ati 4850 HDMI) while getting better are still not quite there when comparing to a video chip in a console unit even after extensive calibration..
[/quote]Really? I honestly have not been able to see much difference between the PC Graphics card and a dedicated unit. Though I dont have a unit to compare side by side.
[/quote]But seriously, there’s been threads and debates ever since the first HTPC came out debating the picture quality possibilities of it versus a separate dedicated device. There’s nothing definitive and usually just comes down to the individual’s opinion.
[/quote]Speaking about 1080p content there was a time when one could make the “PCs don’t do as good a job as a standalone player” argument but I’ve done side-by-side comparisons and if there are differences I can’t seem them. That said, there are still usability arguments that can be made to favor a discrete device.
Once we move to non-1080p (at least in my experience) there is a strong case to be made that the PC’s GPU does a better job than many standalone players.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.