Andrew Van Til
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sorry – should have said try building the graph out side of sage to look like this:
[img width=600 height=140]http://babgvant.com/images/sagemkv.jpg[/img]
use:
SageTV FileSource -> SageTV Stream Demuxer -> MS Decoder -> EVR
-> ffdshow audio decoder -> DirectSoundSorry – should have said try building the graph out side of sage to look like this:
[img width=600 height=140]http://babgvant.com/images/sagemkv.jpg[/img]
use:
SageTV FileSource -> SageTV Stream Demuxer -> MS Decoder -> EVR
-> ffdshow audio decoder -> DirectSoundTry building the graph outside of sage. It should like like this:
[img]http://www.missingremote.com/forum]
Try building the graph outside of sage. It should like like this:
[img]http://www.missingremote.com/forum]
1) You need to use the EVR to enable DXVA2 on Vista/7.
2) Your 4650 doesn’t support bit streaming; did you enabled LPCM output in the ffdshow settings?
1) You need to use the EVR to enable DXVA2 on Vista/7.
2) Your 4650 doesn’t support bit streaming; did you enabled LPCM output in the ffdshow settings?
[quote=”evilpenguin”]
I’d say my concern is more with the structure of the guide. The way you sandwich optional customizations between important steps will be confusing to newbies who will follow this guide word-for-word for their first setup. Maybe just move all the customization stuff (Plugins + Hidden extras) to its own section at the end and include the relevant links to the plugin threads.“Now that you’ve got your base Sage setup and running, here are some customization/enhancments that I enjoy that you might want to explore”…
[/quote]I see plugins and properties section as a good grouping of “optional changes that makes the experience better”.
There are many different ways to organize flow; like grouping by goal (i.e. enabling HD audio) instead of linearly. While I can see your point, it also creates a lot of redundancy. Instead of grouping by task I made a point of outlining the purpose of each step while following a linear workplan to completion so readers [that read and process the information] could determine relevancy and act accordingly.
[quote=”evilpenguin”]
I’d say my concern is more with the structure of the guide. The way you sandwich optional customizations between important steps will be confusing to newbies who will follow this guide word-for-word for their first setup. Maybe just move all the customization stuff (Plugins + Hidden extras) to its own section at the end and include the relevant links to the plugin threads.“Now that you’ve got your base Sage setup and running, here are some customization/enhancments that I enjoy that you might want to explore”…
[/quote]I see plugins and properties section as a good grouping of “optional changes that makes the experience better”.
There are many different ways to organize flow; like grouping by goal (i.e. enabling HD audio) instead of linearly. While I can see your point, it also creates a lot of redundancy. Instead of grouping by task I made a point of outlining the purpose of each step while following a linear workplan to completion so readers [that read and process the information] could determine relevancy and act accordingly.
[quote=”bebopblues”]
Nice job Andy!A trim version would be seem less daunting task to install SageTV for new users. I definitely didn’t do 70% of the those steps and SageTV runs fine with the HD200/HD300. Also, I think if you add a guide to set up an HDHR and HD-PVR, that would be most useful to a lot of users. And as long as you are getting into the web server plugin, you might as well mention steps to setup an IP redirection service (such as dyndns.com, no-ip.com, etc) so they can access the web server from the internet.
[/quote]
Going to try to take a look at QAM tonight, but I don’t have a HDHR so can’t help with that one.
I’d like to do a guide for setting up FW channel changing with the HD PVR & FWChannelProxy at some point, and maybe one that shows how to use IIS7/7.5 as a reverse proxy for the Sage Web Server (so you don’t have to expose it directly on the interwebs) but I don’t use IP redirection so can’t do that one.
[quote=”bebopblues”]
Nice job Andy!A trim version would be seem less daunting task to install SageTV for new users. I definitely didn’t do 70% of the those steps and SageTV runs fine with the HD200/HD300. Also, I think if you add a guide to set up an HDHR and HD-PVR, that would be most useful to a lot of users. And as long as you are getting into the web server plugin, you might as well mention steps to setup an IP redirection service (such as dyndns.com, no-ip.com, etc) so they can access the web server from the internet.
[/quote]
Going to try to take a look at QAM tonight, but I don’t have a HDHR so can’t help with that one.
I’d like to do a guide for setting up FW channel changing with the HD PVR & FWChannelProxy at some point, and maybe one that shows how to use IIS7/7.5 as a reverse proxy for the Sage Web Server (so you don’t have to expose it directly on the interwebs) but I don’t use IP redirection so can’t do that one.
[quote=”evilpenguin”]
In that case, i’d argue that you shouldn’t include any that invovle external setup. I’d say just call out the Webserver as an example of the plugin process since its beneifts work for everyone right out of the box.
[/quote]So I shouldn’t call out the plugins I find useful? To be clear the screenshot was intended to demonstrate an e.g. of a plugin that requires the UI to recycle.
[quote=”evilpenguin”]
In that case, i’d argue that you shouldn’t include any that invovle external setup. I’d say just call out the Webserver as an example of the plugin process since its beneifts work for everyone right out of the box.
[/quote]So I shouldn’t call out the plugins I find useful? To be clear the screenshot was intended to demonstrate an e.g. of a plugin that requires the UI to recycle.
[quote=”shadymg”]
[quote=”Mast3rL33″]
[quote=”theblur20″]
The video cards (ati 4850 HDMI) while getting better are still not quite there when comparing to a video chip in a console unit even after extensive calibration..
[/quote]Really? I honestly have not been able to see much difference between the PC Graphics card and a dedicated unit. Though I dont have a unit to compare side by side.
[/quote]But seriously, there’s been threads and debates ever since the first HTPC came out debating the picture quality possibilities of it versus a separate dedicated device. There’s nothing definitive and usually just comes down to the individual’s opinion.
[/quote]Speaking about 1080p content there was a time when one could make the “PCs don’t do as good a job as a standalone player” argument but I’ve done side-by-side comparisons and if there are differences I can’t seem them. That said, there are still usability arguments that can be made to favor a discrete device.
Once we move to non-1080p (at least in my experience) there is a strong case to be made that the PC’s GPU does a better job than many standalone players.
[quote=”shadymg”]
[quote=”Mast3rL33″]
[quote=”theblur20″]
The video cards (ati 4850 HDMI) while getting better are still not quite there when comparing to a video chip in a console unit even after extensive calibration..
[/quote]Really? I honestly have not been able to see much difference between the PC Graphics card and a dedicated unit. Though I dont have a unit to compare side by side.
[/quote]But seriously, there’s been threads and debates ever since the first HTPC came out debating the picture quality possibilities of it versus a separate dedicated device. There’s nothing definitive and usually just comes down to the individual’s opinion.
[/quote]Speaking about 1080p content there was a time when one could make the “PCs don’t do as good a job as a standalone player” argument but I’ve done side-by-side comparisons and if there are differences I can’t seem them. That said, there are still usability arguments that can be made to favor a discrete device.
Once we move to non-1080p (at least in my experience) there is a strong case to be made that the PC’s GPU does a better job than many standalone players.
[quote=”evilpenguin”]
Two things:1) It might be nice to copy/paste/trim a version of this guide that shows just the steps nessisary for using an entirly extender based setup.
2) You spefically call out the comskip playback plugin, but never any plugin that actually runs comskip.
[/quote]1) Good idea
2) Yep, that was an intentional scoping decision. If I covered all of the stuff I do to make everything on the HTPC work the guide would be 20-30 pages, and then I wouldn’t have material for more guides 🙂
-
AuthorPosts
