Andrew Van Til

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 545 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Re: $30 for PPV? Sure Hollywood. #1233
    Andrew Van Til
    Keymaster

      Not sure where to go with that.  I have a pretty decent setup, but it’s nowhere close to the experience available at the theaters around here.

      in reply to: $30 for PPV? Sure Hollywood. #28091
      Andrew Van Til
      Keymaster

        Not sure where to go with that.  I have a pretty decent setup, but it’s nowhere close to the experience available at the theaters around here.

        in reply to: Re: Maximum PC Moonlights With a HTPC Build #1253
        Andrew Van Til
        Keymaster

          [quote=”autoboy”]
          God I hate HD bitstreaming.  I wish it would just go away.
          [/quote]

          There are a lot of reasons why HD bit streaming is a very nice feature (bypassing the OS’s mixer to name a big one).  Why do you want it to go away?

          in reply to: Maximum PC Moonlights With a HTPC Build #28111
          Andrew Van Til
          Keymaster

            [quote=”autoboy”]
            God I hate HD bitstreaming.  I wish it would just go away.
            [/quote]

            There are a lot of reasons why HD bit streaming is a very nice feature (bypassing the OS’s mixer to name a big one).  Why do you want it to go away?

            in reply to: Re: Panasonic GT25/GT20 review #1261
            Andrew Van Til
            Keymaster

              [quote=”erikt”]
              I want the better VT25 2D PQ without the VT25 cost.  I don’t think it’s the 3D technology per-se which makes the 2D PQ better, maybe I’m wrong…
              [/quote]

              Improvements made to the displays to enable 3D (faster pixels, better contrast, etc) also benefit 2D.  3D isn’t going anywhere; I’d be really surprised if it wasn’t just another checkbox feature (like Vieracast) on most of the mid-range next year.

              All that said, if you look at what a VT25 costs now it is less than what the V10 went for at the same time last year – and that’s even ignoring the free BD deck offer currently going on right now. 

              in reply to: Panasonic GT25/GT20 review #28119
              Andrew Van Til
              Keymaster

                [quote=”erikt”]
                I want the better VT25 2D PQ without the VT25 cost.  I don’t think it’s the 3D technology per-se which makes the 2D PQ better, maybe I’m wrong…
                [/quote]

                Improvements made to the displays to enable 3D (faster pixels, better contrast, etc) also benefit 2D.  3D isn’t going anywhere; I’d be really surprised if it wasn’t just another checkbox feature (like Vieracast) on most of the mid-range next year.

                All that said, if you look at what a VT25 costs now it is less than what the V10 went for at the same time last year – and that’s even ignoring the free BD deck offer currently going on right now. 

                in reply to: Re: Panasonic GT25/GT20 review #1259
                Andrew Van Til
                Keymaster

                  [quote=”Mikinho”]
                  I was honestly hoping for mediocre  reviews since I can’t afford either TV  >:(
                  [/quote]

                  Next years model will be much better (just keep saying that over, and over ;)).

                  [quote=”erikt”]
                  Now, if they’d only create a model with the high-end features/PQ of the VT25 without the 3-D…
                  [/quote]

                  The 3D bits are almost free (look at V10 vs. VT25 pricing) and make the 2D PQ better.  Why would you want to loose that?

                  in reply to: Panasonic GT25/GT20 review #28117
                  Andrew Van Til
                  Keymaster

                    [quote=”Mikinho”]
                    I was honestly hoping for mediocre  reviews since I can’t afford either TV  >:(
                    [/quote]

                    Next years model will be much better (just keep saying that over, and over ;)).

                    [quote=”erikt”]
                    Now, if they’d only create a model with the high-end features/PQ of the VT25 without the 3-D…
                    [/quote]

                    The 3D bits are almost free (look at V10 vs. VT25 pricing) and make the 2D PQ better.  Why would you want to loose that?

                    in reply to: Re: Maximum PC Moonlights With a HTPC Build #1250
                    Andrew Van Til
                    Keymaster

                      Sandy Bridge should be out in early Jan (~CES), AMD/nVidia will have had their mid-range GPUs out long enough to get a decent selection of cards and there will have been enough time for everyone to get the worst of the early adopter kinks worked out of the software (PDVD/TMT) and drivers.

                      There’s also a really good chance that non-exclusive content that doesn’t suck will finally be there.

                      in reply to: Maximum PC Moonlights With a HTPC Build #28108
                      Andrew Van Til
                      Keymaster

                        Sandy Bridge should be out in early Jan (~CES), AMD/nVidia will have had their mid-range GPUs out long enough to get a decent selection of cards and there will have been enough time for everyone to get the worst of the early adopter kinks worked out of the software (PDVD/TMT) and drivers.

                        There’s also a really good chance that non-exclusive content that doesn’t suck will finally be there.

                        in reply to: Re: Maximum PC Moonlights With a HTPC Build #1247
                        Andrew Van Til
                        Keymaster

                          [quote=”Skirge01″]

                          This is probably why magazines don’t do these types of builds very often.  There’s never a “perfect” time.  I won’t begin to understand how long it takes for a magazine article to go from “idea” to “newstand”
                          [/quote]

                          Timing is part of what distinguishes that know what they’re doing from those that don’t 🙂

                          FWIW – I have a feeling that Jan/Feb 2011 will be the perfect time to build a low power, quiet, 3D, HDMI 1.4, bit streaming HTPC.

                          in reply to: Maximum PC Moonlights With a HTPC Build #28105
                          Andrew Van Til
                          Keymaster

                            [quote=”Skirge01″]

                            This is probably why magazines don’t do these types of builds very often.  There’s never a “perfect” time.  I won’t begin to understand how long it takes for a magazine article to go from “idea” to “newstand”
                            [/quote]

                            Timing is part of what distinguishes that know what they’re doing from those that don’t 🙂

                            FWIW – I have a feeling that Jan/Feb 2011 will be the perfect time to build a low power, quiet, 3D, HDMI 1.4, bit streaming HTPC.

                            in reply to: Re: Maximum PC Moonlights With a HTPC Build #1244
                            Andrew Van Til
                            Keymaster

                              [quote=”Mikinho”]
                              One one of the pre-reqs was 3D HDTV and HD Audio bitstreaming so a discrete sound card was needed since the NVIDIA 4xx series weren’t available at the time of the article.
                              [/quote]

                              While that’s true – the problem is that the stated goals are bizarre given product timing that they should have known about.  I don’t think it’s possible for them to have picked a worse time to build that box; had they waited a month (or two) significantly cheaper/better hardware would have been available as well as nVidia’s HDMI 1.4 driver.  Anyone who follows their guidance to achieve similar objectives and doesn’t do some homework will be completely screwed.

                              in reply to: Maximum PC Moonlights With a HTPC Build #28102
                              Andrew Van Til
                              Keymaster

                                [quote=”Mikinho”]
                                One one of the pre-reqs was 3D HDTV and HD Audio bitstreaming so a discrete sound card was needed since the NVIDIA 4xx series weren’t available at the time of the article.
                                [/quote]

                                While that’s true – the problem is that the stated goals are bizarre given product timing that they should have known about.  I don’t think it’s possible for them to have picked a worse time to build that box; had they waited a month (or two) significantly cheaper/better hardware would have been available as well as nVidia’s HDMI 1.4 driver.  Anyone who follows their guidance to achieve similar objectives and doesn’t do some homework will be completely screwed.

                                in reply to: Re: Maximum PC Moonlights With a HTPC Build #1237
                                Andrew Van Til
                                Keymaster

                                  1) They should have known in June (I did) that the 460/450 were coming soon, so that was a bad time to do a feature on building a 3D HTPC
                                  2) We all know that lossless multi-channel LCPM is the same thing as bit streamed HD audio
                                  3) $200 for a PSU?
                                  4) Green drive for a quad HD tuner?

                                Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 545 total)