jrandeck

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 90 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: GeekTonic`s Ultimate Fall TV Guide #27642
    jrandeck
    Participant

      I watched Terriers last night and have to say it was better than I expected.  The name sounds like it belongs on Animal Planet, and I was on the fence after seeing the previews, but I found myself getting into it.   I think it has potential.

      in reply to: Re: GeekTonic`s Ultimate Fall TV Guide #769
      jrandeck
      Participant

        I watched Terriers last night and have to say it was better than I expected.  The name sounds like it belongs on Animal Planet, and I was on the fence after seeing the previews, but I found myself getting into it.   I think it has potential.

        in reply to: Re: Poll: Unboxing – Videos or Photos? #895
        jrandeck
        Participant

          Personally, I never pay too much attention to the unboxing portion of a review anyway.  99.99% of the time it really doesn’t matter to me how the thing is packaged.  I’m more interested in the product itself.

          in reply to: Poll: Unboxing – Videos or Photos? #27759
          jrandeck
          Participant

            Personally, I never pay too much attention to the unboxing portion of a review anyway.  99.99% of the time it really doesn’t matter to me how the thing is packaged.  I’m more interested in the product itself.

            in reply to: New Apple TV #27736
            jrandeck
            Participant

              [quote=”autoboy”]
              The fact that it will run on iphone hardware makes it easy to build apps for it in the itunes store.
              [/quote]

              I haven’t seen anything that indicates you’ll be able to run apps on it.  Engadget seems to think that’s not a feature: http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/01/appletv-vs-the-competition-how-does-it-stack-up/

              If it could run apps I would probably give it a try just to see what it can do.  Their $.99 TV show rental fee will never fly in my house (maybe if it had the capability to download and store them).  Good luck getting Hulu or any of the network sites on it.

              in reply to: Re: New Apple TV #869
              jrandeck
              Participant

                [quote=”autoboy”]
                The fact that it will run on iphone hardware makes it easy to build apps for it in the itunes store.
                [/quote]

                I haven’t seen anything that indicates you’ll be able to run apps on it.  Engadget seems to think that’s not a feature: http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/01/appletv-vs-the-competition-how-does-it-stack-up/

                If it could run apps I would probably give it a try just to see what it can do.  Their $.99 TV show rental fee will never fly in my house (maybe if it had the capability to download and store them).  Good luck getting Hulu or any of the network sites on it.

                in reply to: Re: Commodore PC64: Looks Like a Commodore, Works Like a PC #828
                jrandeck
                Participant

                  [quote=”Skirge01″]
                  To be fair, the fastload and super snapshot cartridges did allow for shortcuts to be used, so if you had one of those, you may have pressed a two key combo in order for it to type out LOAD “*”,8,1 for your lazy arse.  😉  I had super snapshot personally and remember typing $ to see the directory of disks, rather than LOAD “$”,8.  I wouldn’t have remembered that stuff had I not watched that video I linked to.  BTW, if you didn’t watch it through to the end, you missed the funniest parts, as the guy gets ticked off at himself and the Commodore keyboard layout!
                  [/quote]

                  OK, I went and watched the video.  It starts kind of slow but the end is funny.  He’s cheating and using an emulator, though, which is probably why he as so much trouble with the keyboard.

                  Ah, the poke command.  I used to have the memory map memorized.

                  I had a quick load cartridge back in the day also.  I soldered a reset switch into it so I wouldn’t fry the computer shorting pins on the back with a paper clip any more (yes, I used to do that.  It worked great the first 20 times, but that last one…)

                  in reply to: Commodore PC64: Looks Like a Commodore, Works Like a PC #27697
                  jrandeck
                  Participant

                    [quote=”Skirge01″]
                    To be fair, the fastload and super snapshot cartridges did allow for shortcuts to be used, so if you had one of those, you may have pressed a two key combo in order for it to type out LOAD “*”,8,1 for your lazy arse.  😉  I had super snapshot personally and remember typing $ to see the directory of disks, rather than LOAD “$”,8.  I wouldn’t have remembered that stuff had I not watched that video I linked to.  BTW, if you didn’t watch it through to the end, you missed the funniest parts, as the guy gets ticked off at himself and the Commodore keyboard layout!
                    [/quote]

                    OK, I went and watched the video.  It starts kind of slow but the end is funny.  He’s cheating and using an emulator, though, which is probably why he as so much trouble with the keyboard.

                    Ah, the poke command.  I used to have the memory map memorized.

                    I had a quick load cartridge back in the day also.  I soldered a reset switch into it so I wouldn’t fry the computer shorting pins on the back with a paper clip any more (yes, I used to do that.  It worked great the first 20 times, but that last one…)

                    in reply to: Re: Commodore PC64: Looks Like a Commodore, Works Like a PC #827
                    jrandeck
                    Participant

                      [quote=”shadymg”]
                      you guys are showing your age…i used the C64 a ton but i don’t remember any of those special keys 😛 guess i was too busy using the joystick 🙂
                      [/quote]

                      I guess it would really show my age if I told you that I wrote most of my papers in college on a C64 then 🙂   

                      Of course I also played Gunship when I should have been studying for finals 😉

                      in reply to: Commodore PC64: Looks Like a Commodore, Works Like a PC #27696
                      jrandeck
                      Participant

                        [quote=”shadymg”]
                        you guys are showing your age…i used the C64 a ton but i don’t remember any of those special keys 😛 guess i was too busy using the joystick 🙂
                        [/quote]

                        I guess it would really show my age if I told you that I wrote most of my papers in college on a C64 then 🙂   

                        Of course I also played Gunship when I should have been studying for finals 😉

                        in reply to: Re: Commodore PC64: Looks Like a Commodore, Works Like a PC #819
                        jrandeck
                        Participant

                          Pretty cool, but I think the keyboard layout will be  a problem for most users (Where’s the key?)  Of course, the press release doesn’t mention the OS, but connecting a mouse to a C64 would just feel wrong.

                          in reply to: Commodore PC64: Looks Like a Commodore, Works Like a PC #27688
                          jrandeck
                          Participant

                            Pretty cool, but I think the keyboard layout will be  a problem for most users (Where’s the key?)  Of course, the press release doesn’t mention the OS, but connecting a mouse to a C64 would just feel wrong.

                            in reply to: Re: Review: Ceton InfiniTV 4 Quad CableCARD Tuner – Part I #341
                            jrandeck
                            Participant

                              [quote=”Matt”]
                              To sucessfully pass the Digital Cable Advisor tool aren’t you required to have 4GB of RAM?
                              [/quote]

                              I believe the items on that page are recommendations and not requirements.

                              in reply to: Review: Ceton InfiniTV 4 Quad CableCARD Tuner – Part I #27231
                              jrandeck
                              Participant

                                [quote=”Matt”]
                                To sucessfully pass the Digital Cable Advisor tool aren’t you required to have 4GB of RAM?
                                [/quote]

                                I believe the items on that page are recommendations and not requirements.

                                in reply to: Re: Is component video and HD audio over HDMI possible? #603
                                jrandeck
                                Participant

                                  To get audio from the DVI port on your video card (assuming your card supports that) you’ll need the adapter made specifically for that card, a standard DVI to HDMI adapter won’t work since audio isn’t part of the DVI standard, so different manufacturers have different schemes to make that work. 

                                  Beyond that, I’d think it should be possible to have both outputs active (as if you have two monitors), but it would probably take some tweaking of settings. 

                                Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 90 total)