mikinho

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,016 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #28378
    mikinho
    Participant

      [quote=”babgvant”]
      The HQV-HD scores aren’t looking that great, so it might be worth waiting a couple drivers to see if they can clear that up.
      [/quote]

      Well I won’t be buying a new TV anytime soon sadly.  But it is a good point.  I’m sure the drivers will fix the issues, I believe the G 210 had the problem.  Waiting is good, as you’e previously pointed out in other posts now isn’t the best time to invest into HTPCs with 3DTV capabilities.

      Once AMD releases their 6xxx series and Intel comes out w/ Sandy Bridge it will be interesting to see which is the preferred HTPC 3DTV platform.

      in reply to: Re: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #1517
      mikinho
      Participant

        [quote=”SikSlayer”]
        Wait a sec, this isn’t the first card to do this from Nvidia, that would have been the GTX 460. This card, however, is a better physical fit for an HTPC.
        [/quote]

        That is why I said “first HTPC-centric consumer”.  The GTX 460 and 450 already offer it but neither is very HTPC friendly w/ the higher power consumption, two-slot form factor and neither is available as low-profile.  The GT 420 also offers it but it is an OEM only card.

        in reply to: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #28375
        mikinho
        Participant

          [quote=”SikSlayer”]
          Wait a sec, this isn’t the first card to do this from Nvidia, that would have been the GTX 460. This card, however, is a better physical fit for an HTPC.
          [/quote]

          That is why I said “first HTPC-centric consumer”.  The GTX 460 and 450 already offer it but neither is very HTPC friendly w/ the higher power consumption, two-slot form factor and neither is available as low-profile.  The GT 420 also offers it but it is an OEM only card.

          in reply to: Re: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #1516
          mikinho
          Participant

            newfiend over @ tgb linked to a review of the GT 430: [url=http://www.legitreviews.com/news/9145/]http://www.legitreviews.com/news/9145/[/url].  Everything seems to be what you’d expect and they confirm that the card is quiet.

            in reply to: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #28374
            mikinho
            Participant

              newfiend over @ tgb linked to a review of the GT 430: [url=http://www.legitreviews.com/news/9145/]http://www.legitreviews.com/news/9145/[/url].  Everything seems to be what you’d expect and they confirm that the card is quiet.

              in reply to: Re: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #1514
              mikinho
              Participant

                Well speaking from my own experience w/ EVGA cards they are very quiet.  The fan looks to be a similar model that they use on their G 210, GT220 and GT240.  The firmware is set to only turn the fan on when needed, in typical HTPC usage that is never.

                in reply to: EVGA`s GeForce GT 430 #28372
                mikinho
                Participant

                  Well speaking from my own experience w/ EVGA cards they are very quiet.  The fan looks to be a similar model that they use on their G 210, GT220 and GT240.  The firmware is set to only turn the fan on when needed, in typical HTPC usage that is never.

                  in reply to: Re: Review: Ceton InfiniTV 4 Quad CableCARD Tuner – Part I #372
                  mikinho
                  Participant

                    [quote=”rekd0514″]
                    You are taking almost as long to finish Part II as Ceton is getting more cards out. I’m just messing with you man, someone had to say it. 😀
                    [/quote]

                    And sadly well deserved.

                    The next batch of cards were sent out yesterday.  Hmmmm…I need to get my act together.

                    in reply to: Review: Ceton InfiniTV 4 Quad CableCARD Tuner – Part I #27261
                    mikinho
                    Participant

                      [quote=”rekd0514″]
                      You are taking almost as long to finish Part II as Ceton is getting more cards out. I’m just messing with you man, someone had to say it. 😀
                      [/quote]

                      And sadly well deserved.

                      The next batch of cards were sent out yesterday.  Hmmmm…I need to get my act together.

                      in reply to: Re: CableLabs Updates Tuning Resolver Specs #1504
                      mikinho
                      Participant

                        The negative side is that the updated specification only applies to new or updated firmwares needing certification.

                        In terms of cable companies actually deploying them…well that is anyway’s guess.  I suggest everyone “accidentally” break their TAs to force them to purchase newupdated equipment =)

                        [i](Disclaimer: I don’t actually suggest breaking anything)[/i]

                        in reply to: CableLabs Updates Tuning Resolver Specs #28362
                        mikinho
                        Participant

                          The negative side is that the updated specification only applies to new or updated firmwares needing certification.

                          In terms of cable companies actually deploying them…well that is anyway’s guess.  I suggest everyone “accidentally” break their TAs to force them to purchase newupdated equipment =)

                          [i](Disclaimer: I don’t actually suggest breaking anything)[/i]

                          in reply to: Re: CableLabs Updates Tuning Resolver Specs #1502
                          mikinho
                          Participant

                            From the Engineering Change Form is appears TiVo was the driving force.  I really should have covered TiVo’s involvement–I apologize.

                            I may follow up with some speculation on what is coming from TiVo but I’ll keep that separate =)

                            in reply to: CableLabs Updates Tuning Resolver Specs #28360
                            mikinho
                            Participant

                              From the Engineering Change Form is appears TiVo was the driving force.  I really should have covered TiVo’s involvement–I apologize.

                              I may follow up with some speculation on what is coming from TiVo but I’ll keep that separate =)

                              in reply to: Re: CableLabs Updates Tuning Resolver Specs #1500
                              mikinho
                              Participant

                                erkotz (Missing Remote and tgb member) was kind enough inform me that an updated firmware for the Motorola TAs were released that enable 6-streams per TA.

                                He also provided a link to the updated specifications.  I’ve updated the article with both pieces of information.  Thanks erkotz.

                                in reply to: CableLabs Updates Tuning Resolver Specs #28358
                                mikinho
                                Participant

                                  erkotz (Missing Remote and tgb member) was kind enough inform me that an updated firmware for the Motorola TAs were released that enable 6-streams per TA.

                                  He also provided a link to the updated specifications.  I’ve updated the article with both pieces of information.  Thanks erkotz.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 1,016 total)